Authority:
The writer’s professional background is unknown .We cannot see he or she has study manual health or burnout .Without professor knowledge on this topic ,the wrier cannot give trustworthy professorial ideas .For college research ,this source do not have enough authority .Students cannot depend on this author’s understanding of burnout.
Reliability:
This article gives opinions but provides little support evidence. There are no research data,survey results or real world examples inside.Readers cannot check whether these viewpoints are true .So it is not reliable material for academic study about burnout.We have no way to prove that its arguments are correct.
Currency:
We cannot find the clear publish date of this article. Burnout studies develop fast and new find come out every year .Old information may be out of date .Since its time of writing is unclear ,it cannot be trusted for current day research.We do not know today its ideas still hold true .
Objectivity/subjectivity:
In this article there have more personal feel and personal experience.The writer shares one sided views instead of belenced ,neutral analysis .It lacks different standpoint about burnout .It has more personal bias makes it too subjective for formal academic work.Personal feel should not as main evidence in article.
Academic conventions:
This article follows few academic rules .It have no text citations and no reference list at the end .It does not show where its information comes form .Without correct academic formatting ,it frills to meet the atendards of college surge material. Readers cannot follow up and cheat the original sources information.
